http://www.articlesnatch.com/profile/James-D--Scott/14064 James D. Scott is an author at ArticleSnatch.com Article Directory. Below are the most recent articles from James D. Scott. For more of articles by James D. Scott please use the link above. http://www.articlesnatch.com/profile/James-D--Scott/14064 http://static.articlesnatch.com/i/logo.gif en-us http://www.articlesnatch.com/profile/James-D--Scott/14064 PHP/5.0.26 http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/WHO-PAYS-FOR-TRANSPORTATION-WHEN-THE-CHILD-MOVES-ACROSS-COUNTRY-----/178746 BY JAMES D. SCOTT, CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW SPECIALIST COPYRIGHT 2007 When the parent with the most child sharing time moves across the country, extra efforts must be made for the child or the children to keep frequent and continuing contact with the parent and other family members who remain behind. A move-away by the custodial parent&nbsp; diminishes the percentage&nbsp; of calendar time spent by the child with the parent who remains behind.&nbsp; This has the double whammy or triple whammy of causing an increase in the child support payment when the parent left behind has been ordered to pay support.&nbsp; A second unfortunate effect of the move-away is the negative hit to the amount of time that the child is able to spend with the parent left behind.&nbsp; The frequency of those periods of access to the child diminishes and the stability of the parent/child relationship is jeopardized.&nbsp; The third negative impact of a move-away is the cost of transportation.&nbsp;** End Summary**<p>About the Author:<br>Auther profile: The law firm of <a href="http://www.scottfamilylaw.net/">James D. Scott</a> is a <a href="http://calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_generic.jsp?cid=11584">Certified Specialist of Family Law</a> and practices Divorce and Family Law in San Diego, CA. Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0400 http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/WHO-PAYS-FOR-TRANSPORTATION-WHEN-THE-CHILD-MOVES-ACROSS-COUNTRY-----/178746 http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/I-Thought-Our-House-Was-Community-Property--Buyer-Beware-/153861 I Thought Our House Was Community Property Buyer Beware! By James D. Scott In today's real estate mortgage market, one spouse often has better credit than the other spouse.; In order to obtain a more favorable interest rate on a mortgage, one spouse will quit claim their interest in the house to the other spouse as their sole and separate property.; This form of title is often demanded by the lender.; The house is being purchased during the marriage and the married couple believes in good faith the house is community property. In the past courts did not exalt form over substance.; The new house title in form is separate property, yet the substance and intent of the parties was to purchase the house together as community property. The courts have reversed themselves in the recent case of, "In re Marriage of Matthews", and courts are enforcing the form of the transaction and not the substance.;** End Summary**<p>About the Author:<br>Auther profile: The law firm of <a href="http://www.scottfamilylaw.net/">James D. Scott</a> is a <a href="http://calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_generic.jsp?cid=11584">Certified Specialist of Family Law</a> and practices Divorce and Family Law in San Diego, CA. Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0400 http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/I-Thought-Our-House-Was-Community-Property--Buyer-Beware-/153861