Conventional medicine wants you to believe that surgery, radiation and chemotherapy is your only recourse against cancer. Maybe it's because the average cancer patient represents a $500,000 payday for the cancer treatment system. Money is being made while your health is undergoing collateral damage. Never mind that most cancer patients will spend many months receiving chemo poison and radiation which shreds their body, including the immune system.
Go ask a person who has gone through the conventional chemo process and see if they wouldn't mind going through it again if informed of the bad news that there was still cancer present. It will be like trying to find an athiest in a foxhole.
Did you know that 75% of the average oncologist's "take home pay" is profit from the chemo drugs he gives to his patients. Your oncologist is just doing his job, working with information that's been approved by our fabulously corrupt Food and Drug Administration and its overlords at the American Medical Association. Cancer therapy is big business which means huge dollars. we all want live in a world which is cancer free from the suffering which it brings, but the hypocrisy is amazing
Before you submit yourself to toxic tests and "therapies" that so often just increase your pain and suffering, doesn't it make sense to know all of your options?
Recently, when one of the world's largest cancer centers surveyed oncologists about how they would treat their own cancers, almost 90% said they would refuse chemotherapy. They said that chemotherapy drugs were non-neffective and have a high degree of toxicity.
The fact is that by shrinking tumors, chemo actually encourages stronger cancer cells to grow and multiply, becoming chemo-resistant. To top things off, there are the new cancers caused by chemotherapy, or secondary cancers. Somehow they forget to mention this life-threatening detail on the list of "side effects" in some drug companyaccompanying literature.
Sometimes people become statistics. The big-pharma and the other special interest groups which have an obvious conflict of interest due to huge profits that cancer reaps will present a different picture to continue to get the funds. They want you to be like sheep with a leash. The minute "sheeple" start to think for themselves and investigate other options, the leash gets a firm jerk and in some cases, an extreme jerk to let you know "who is boss". Pretty soon, the sheep is content to go where his leader lets him.
The truth is, good health is a matter of common sense and having a healthy dose of cynicism about what the "authorities" have to say about what's good for you, and what's not. Too often society, in regard to cancer, will look to natural alternatives as a last resort. Some natural metabolic cancer treatments will include small amounts of chemo in the protocol, but it would be compared to adding a little seasoning with the food. Conventional cancer treatment is the other way around and it is big money which equal big profit.
Prevention is the key, but there are other options available for those that have been diagnosed than the conventional chemo and radiation package. Various cancer "awareness months" are in vogue and the spirit is all good, but I can't help shaking my head knowing that any natural, non-pharmaceutical drug will not be considered in treating cancer.
Please consider that centuries ago some people thought that the earth was flat, and more recent, World War 1 would be the war to end all wars. we all know how these proclamations worked out and same is true that chemo is only way to beat cancer.
