R22 Refrigerant Gas Will Become Drastically More Expensive In 2010

R22 refrigerant gas is one of the guilty parties when it comes to harming the environment even though it is vital to our economy, society, and safety of our ice cream. That's why the United States and many other countries around the world have joined together in an effort to convert usage of R22 refrigerant in commercial facilities to more environmentally friendly alternatives.

Among the refrigerants approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for use in commercial facilities are ammonia, R404A and R407c. The newer generation of refrigerants, classified as SNAP refrigerants, contain non of the negative effects of current HCFCs.

The conversion process is already underway among many organizations that own or operate heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC-R) systems to meet the 2015 phase out deadline. Many organizations are already well into the process of implementing software solutions to help with the management, tracking, and reporting of refrigerant gases. This will only help manage their existing inventory of refrigerant gas (R22).

Used extensively throughout the world, R22 refrigerant is vital to the operation of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC-R) systems installed in the majority of commercial and business facilities. It can also be found in process chiller and industrial refrigerant plants. The widespread use of the chemical is a paramount concern because when a leak occurs hydrochlorofluorocarbons are released. They are deemed harmful because they damage the ozone layer and contribute to global warming.

It is a monumental task for facilities to replace R22 refrigerant. For many, it means changing existing heating and cooling systems or installing new equipment, all with minimal interruption to business. When a HVAC-R system is serviced, technicians or the system owner must account for the removal, recapturing, and destruction of any refrigerant gas tracked under US EPA laws.

Under proposed amendments to a 2009 law (starting in California then perhaps nationally via the EPA), reporting requirements became stiffer. Companies using systems containing 50 pounds or more of R22 refrigerant must submit annual reports of its usage, service, and leaks, while facilities with larger systems have a more frequent reporting schedule and in some cases requirements on automatic leak detection equipment.

As a result of new environmental laws, managing the use of R22 refrigerant gas is more important than ever as government regulators can conduct unannounced spot checks to ensure tracking records comply with the reporting requirements. In the event that a HVAC-R system leaks refrigerant gas, an organization must record and document the servicing technician, the types of refrigerant used, the date of the service, and any amount of gas recovered. Many of the concerns laid out here are on top of the fact that the supply of R22 will be 20% below market demand by next year. In 2010, many organizations will find their supply of R22 much smaller.

Currently, the use of R22 refrigerant is banned in many areas of production, in household equipment and in certain types of vehicles. It is no longer being used in new refrigeration and air conditioning equipment being manufactured after 2010. By 2010, the use of new R22 refrigerant in the maintenance and servicing of existing refrigeration and air conditioning systems will be banned. By 2015, organizations using recycled R22 refrigerant for the same purposes will be prohibited.

Under the U.S. Clean Air Act, businesses using R22 refrigerant must follow specific containment and management practices to recover and recycle the harmful gas during installation, service or retirement of a system. Many organizations turn to software programs and tracking applications to conduct this tedious task of maintaining service records, calculation refrigerant leak rates, and reporting electronically to the EPA or other legislative bodies.

R22 refrigerant is just one of many substances that have been identified by the United States and other countries as causing long-term harm to the ozone layer. More recently, these substances have shown to have global warming potential. The effort to phase out dangerous substances will help the world reach its unified goal of recovering the damage done to date to the ozone layer and improve the overall health of the environment for years to come.