Darwin's Evolution Theory: The Setback

One of the greatest boons for Darwins evolution theory was an experiment named the Miller/Urey experiment. This experiment used a number of chemicals, including ammonia and hydrogen. By putting electrical charges into these chemicals it produced two of the very simplest of amino acids (a couple of the building blocks for a protein molecule).
This test gave promise to the hope that just was just possibly the way life began. This experiment gained a great amount of attention because the experiment gave much validity to the idea that life came from non-living (inorganic) chemicals.
It wasnt long before this hope was dashed. Some huge problems arose:

One of these was the fact that there was no oxygen used in the experiment. Almost all life forms require oxygen. But this oxygen would completely destroy this experiment (it would cause an explosion). Oxygen, although needed for almost all forms of life, will eliminate the possibility of life also during the initial stages. I.e. the exact same ingredient that is required for life is the very thing that eliminates life in the beginning stages.

Besides this problem, others arise as well:
1.No scientific evidence exists to show that the atmosphere was even close to the same type of atmosphere that was used in the experiment has never existed on earth.
2.If it ever did exist, it would be deadly to virtually all forms of life on earth
3.The chemicals used in the experiment would eliminate the possibility of life ever forming.
The experiment has ended up being a dead end for people looking for the 'beginning of life' (according to the theory of evolution).

It does get much worse.


Even many evolutionists admit that this experiment does not help the theory. But many teachers, textbooks and even professors use this experiment to support the evolution theory.
So, even though this experiment has no validity (to use in support for the theory of evolution), our children are still being taught that it is valid. The textbooks used across our nation still use the experiment although it has been rejected by evolutionists decades ago as any evidence to help evolution
That would mean that our young adults and even our children are being instructed with 'facts' that completely contradict science (Unfortunately, literally scores of these examples are still being taught from textbooks across our nation).
Students are being taught Darwin's evolution theory by dozens of 'facts' that have been proven wrong decades ago. Has the time come to replace this type of information in textbooks with the truth? Or should we allow these textbooks to continue giving our students outdated (and false) information?