What can Christians do to go back the U. S. to a Christian nation?
This is a question that should not necessarily be answered without first defining what a Christian nation is. Nevertheless, in many ways, it's easier to define such a Christian nation is not than what it's. There are two things it's not necessarily.
First, contrary to the fears raised by secularists along with the pejoratives used by this political left, a modern Christian nation is not really coercive. No, Christians do not want to force absolutely everyone to pray; and they will not pass a law which everyone must attend church, etc. Too many today bring to mind a Christian nation with regard to the historical Christian nations associated with Europe: Great Britain, Southern Spain, Portugal, Germany, Sweden, France (during the time of American exploration and discovery), etc. But our Founders endeavored to make clear that American Christianity was not like that in The EU.
Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo similarly affirmed:
I take judge-made law as one of the existing realities of existence.
David Barton tell us that judicially-enacted policies more often reflect individual can beliefs of judges than of society most importantly, and judicial policy-makers are regularly using step with the most people. For example, even though 82 percent with the nation support school desires, 33 living constitution judges disallow that practice. Even though 66 percent support marriage as being between one man and one woman, 35 living composition judges reject that deal and mandate other mixtures. 36 Living constitution judges also have made abortion-on-demand for almost any reason the national policy, even though only 21 percent in the nation support that unrestricted abortion policy.
David Barton tell us that living constitution judges additionally overturn popular elections with that they disagree, including elections in the big apple and Washington that banned physician-assisted suicides, in Wyoming and Washington that passed term limits, in Missouri which rejected a tax increase, and in California that will defined legal marriage being a man and a lovely women. Ironically, each of these elections would have been valid under a great originalist judge because none of the issues violated explicit constitutional clauses.
In short, original intent empowers the individuals whereas the living composition empowers an unaccountable high level; and the President, more than any other individual, will determine which process becomes national policy through the judges he appoints. This runs specifically true in this election, for in the event the next President takes business office in January 2009, six of the nine Supreme Court Justices is going to be at least 70 yoa - and five of the six Justices have been living constitution adherents, repeatedly striking down public policies friendly to Biblical values.
