Cautionary Tales Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet And Miller's The Crucible

Cautionary Tales Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet And Miller's The Crucible

By:


Certain works of literature are written to be cautionary tales. Fables, parables, and Greek tragedies all contain messages and morals that advise against particular behaviors: gluttony, prejudice, and hubris, to name a few. Characters in these kinds of works who display these qualities (sometimes referred to as a fatal flaw) will inevitably reach a tragic end. Other stories simply become cautionary tales because of the terrible things that happen to the characters in them.

Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet ends in the tragic deaths of two teenagers, and may seem like a story that warns against disobeying ones parents, or making crazy plans that involve fake suicide, or falling in love too young and too fast (way, way, way too fast, but this article isnt trying to judge them), but the first lines of the play seem to suggest something different entirely. The plays preamble (in rarity in Shakespeares tragedies) references how The Montagues ancient grudge with the Capulets leads to new mutiny and warns against civil blood that makes civil hands unclean. The preamble also calls young Romeo and Juliet star-crossed lovers indicating that their tragic endings are not in fact the result of their own doing, but instead something fated, something out of their hands.

That something is, of course, their parents ancient grudge." The play tells us that both houses are alike in dignity so the problem between them does not seem to stem from a disparity in wealth or class. In fact, the source of the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is never actually revealed, likely because the reason for their mutual hatred is irrelevant. Any dispute so intense that it ultimately results in two innocent teenagers dying is, by definition, ridiculous. Romeo and Juliet warns not of the dangers of youthful indiscretion (or inefficient message delivery) but of adult prejudice.

Arthur Millers The Crucible contains a similar message. Though his play about the Salem witch trials is actually an allegory for 20th century McCarthyism, he chose that comparison because both events came about due to dangerous prejudices and a mob mentality. Of course, the senseless deaths that resulted due to the Salem witch trials are much more tragic than the blacklistings and deportations of the McCarthy era, Miller warned about the dangers of unfairly targeting one individual or group of individuals and making her/them scapegoats.

The Montagues and Capulets are rarely compared to the House Un-American Activities Committee or the people of Salem, Massachussets, circa 1692, they are linked by their inability to move past their preconceived notions and think about who could be hurt.

Though William Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet nearly four hundred years before Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible (though the actual Salem witch trials took place about a century after Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet), it seems that the human race has not yet been able to learn that preexisting notions about a particular person due to gender, religion, race, political affiliations or family ties will result in tragedy.

About the Author:
Shmoop is an online study guide to learn about Romeo and Juliet, The Crucible and many more. Its content is written by Ph.D. and Masters students from top universities, like Stanford, Berkeley, Harvard, and Yale who have also taught at the high school and college levels. Teachers and students should feel confident to cite Shmoop.



Article Originally Published On: http://www.articlesnatch.com


Tags: , ,

|

Loading...
Related....
Videos...

Recent Reference-and-Education Articles

Comments

Still can't find what you are looking for? Search for it!

Loading

Site Navigation:

Copyright 2005-2011 ArticleSnatch, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service.