Are Rows & Curls 2nd Class?

Are Rows & Curls 2nd Class?

By:


Its pretty rare that I get a question that Ive not seen or been asked before (or asked myself), so when I do, I get pretty pumped.

Thats what happened the other day. Tom H. from the UK shot me an email, asking me something that had I not really been asked before, but showed a lot of intelligence on his partdude did some thinking.

Im paraphrasing here, but the basic gist of Toms email goes like this:

Why are pulling movements usually considered just supplementary exercises or as assistance work? Tom goes on to describe how most tested (be it in powerlifting, Olympic lifting, or pretty much any other lifting competitions) movements are extension movements not flexion.

Meaning that during the exertion portion of the movement, joints are being opened not closed. For example, when exerting during a triceps movement, you do it while extending your arm straight, thus opening the elbow. This would be an extension movement. On the other hand, during a biceps movement, you exert when bringing your hand to your shoulder, thus closing the elbow. This would be a flexion movement.

So, the question begs why arent flexion movements generally treated as primary exercises, and why arent they tested in competitions?

There are a ton of possible answers to these questions, and quite honestly, most (none?) of them will be right or wrong. That said, here are my thoughts

First of all, nobody ever said that you couldnt make pulling movements a primary exercise instead of just accessory work. It all depends on what your training needs and what your goals are. Pulling is much more important than pushing in combat sports (esp grappling), so anybody that participates in MMA, wrestling, BJJ, or the like would be smart to give pulling exercises primary focus (at least for a while) in their training. I know I did when I created the Championship Edition 2.0 MMA workout.

I feel one of the reasons why pulling movements generally arent done as primary exercises is that in many programs, primary exercises are concerned with improving strength (say building to a 5RM). When your training has this kinda focus, that work you do for that movement is going to have that focus. Or, in other words, youre gonna be interested in always putting more weight on the bar.

With pulling movements, this isnt always a good idea.

If youre bench pressing, you either lift the weight or you dont. Sure, you can cheat some by bouncing the weight off your chest. But when it comes to completing the rep, anything less than lockout isnt a full lift.

Same kinda thing goes with the squat. Sure, you can not go down all the way, but to complete the lift, youve gotta lock the rep out.

Cheating or incomplete ROM aside, once you finally get to that point of the rep (and given proper exercise execution and ROM, its at the very beginning of the rep) that youre testing strength, then its up to you to complete the rep. You cant really cheat the weight up.

Now lets look at a pulling movement like a bent row. Here, your strongest part of the movement (where the lifter is generally the strongest) isnt at exercise completion its when you start. (Yeah, I know this kinda thing varies from person to person and exercise to exercise. Just stick w/me for a minute.) You also wont have a sticking point that if you get through it, you can complete the rep (like you might have with a bench press, squat, or the like). Once you stick on a bent row, thats it game over. Youre done.

As a result, it can lead to a lot of cheating when doing the exercise, and some pretty funky form. This is the same with all pulling movements.
When people cheat at pushing exercises, its generally bouncing the bottom of the movement (bench, deadlift, turning a strict overhead press into a pushpress, etc) or cutting the ROM short (squat). Most of these exercises also have a sticking point as we just discussed.

However, when people cheat at pulling movements, its generally using a bunch of swinging or body momentum. Think bent rows, DB rows, or barbell curls. And like we talked about before, there usually isnt a sticking point in these movements.

When movements are tested in a competition like a powerlifting meet, as long as proper ROM is maintained and other certain factors are met (e.g. feet, ass, and shoulders stay put and dont move in the bench press), nobody really gives a damn about form. If you get the weight gets lifted and the rep is completed, the lift is good. When going for a true max, many times form is kinda ugly, but thats Ok. Its a 1RM attempt ugly form now and then is Ok (just dont make it a regular thing) and getting through a sticking point can lead to that.

Imagine trying to do that with a pulling movement though would never happen. To get more weight up, youd have to cheat. And unless you bring something into play in order to maintain proper form (say leaning against a wall when doing curls), then its too hard to maintain that form.

Maintaining proper form when going for new maxes in pulling movements for less than 5-6 reps generally just results to lousy form. So why even mess with it? In my programs, when Im doing heavy sets of pulling movements, theres not really much need to go below 5-6 reps when looking to build strength.

Also, in my programs, because I always wanna make sure pulling and pushing movements are kept equal, though a pushing exercise might be deemed primary and pulling exercise deemed accessory, the pulling movement will almost always have as much, if not more, volume than the primary movement, and generally, more of the volume will be done heavy when compared to the primary movement.

For example, say a program involves building up to a 3RM on the bench press, and after warming up, it takes you 8 sets (which would be a lot) to get there. You just did 24 total work reps, with really only the last 2-3 sets being taxing. Then you might follow it up with heavy rows for 4 sets of 6-8 reps, which would be 24-32 total reps and probably all sets would be taxing.

Just because pulling exercises arent always labeled as primary doesnt mean they get secondary treatment. You just gotta make sure your program is designed correctly.

About the Author:
Click here for muscle building workouts, a cardio workout that don't need gyms, fancy machines, or running, or a MMA workout that was originally designed for a UFC Champ.



Article Originally Published On: http://www.articlesnatch.com


Tags: , , ,

|

Loading...
Related....
Videos...

Recent Build-Muscle Articles

Comments

Still can't find what you are looking for? Search for it!

Loading

Site Navigation:

Copyright 2005-2011 ArticleSnatch, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service.