Are Drinking Water Filters Necessary?

Are Drinking Water Filters Necessary?

By:


Getting ready to buy drinking water filters? That's a great decision. Some people believe that a drinking water filter for their home is not a necessary expense. This is difficult to believe because they are not expensive, at all.

Drinking water filters are far less expensive than a television or a personal computer. Yet many people feel that those are "necessities". It is rare to see a household these days without a TV and a computer, but it's just as rare to see a house with a drinking water filter on their tap.

Scientists and environmental groups keep warning governments about the dangers of chlorination, but the dangers of not chlorinating are real too. During the outbreak of cholera in Peru in 1991, health experts strongly suggested to local facilities to kill the cholera pathogen with chlorine. Because chlorination by-products or THMs increase the risk of cancer, local officials in Peru and other countries were resistant to use chorine.

Researchers in Canada recently estimated that a total of 703 cancer cases per year were caused by exposure to THMs. But, 10,000 people died from cholera between the months of January and February, 1991 in Peru.

Yes, THMs increase the risk of cancer and everyone should have showerhead and drinking water filters to reduce the risk. But, don't petition government agencies to stop chlorinating the water. It just isn't practical.

Of course, chlorine is used nearly everywhere and government agencies try to control the amount of exposure as much as possible, but other disinfection methods are simply not as effective. Buying a point-of-use drinking water filter that removes chlorine and THMs is the only answer.

Water treatment facilities use chlorine to block the growth of algae in the pipes. Algae will affect the taste of water, and the microorganisms that cause cholera and other waterborne illnesses would begin to multiply within the algae. This is the reason behind the water treatment facilities decision to not use carbon filtration to remove the chlorine, as the water leaves the facility.

Another recent study warns that the risk to those who swim in chlorinated pools, combined with exposure at home from drinking and showering, is "unacceptable" and "something should be done". Why don't they just advise swimmers to get showerhead and drinking water filters?

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency now requires that facilities publish a quality report on an annual basis. On them, they list chlorine and chloramines, along with THMs.

The facilities annual reports was required after a study in California showed that women who drink five or more glasses a day of ordinary tap water have a higher rate of miscarriage, possibly due to chlorine. One wonders, why didn't they suggest that pregnant women get a drinking water filter? It seems such an easy and inexpensive solution. It cost less than neo-natal vitamins.

Scientists want you to be aware of the risks and government officials expect you to make your own decisions. It just seems so logical to me, so go ahead you can get the best drinking water filters on the market for less than $125 and showerhead units cost even less. Don't you think your family's health is worth the investment?

About the Author:
The Author: Thomas Manso - If you are investigating for a water filter with outstanding value, consider the Aquasana Filters. You will notice softer skin and hair in just a few days by showering and bathing in filtered water.



Article Originally Published On: http://www.articlesnatch.com


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Loading...
Related....
Videos...

Recent Home-and-Family Articles

Comments

Still can't find what you are looking for? Search for it!

Loading

Site Navigation:

Copyright 2005-2011 ArticleSnatch, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service.