A History Of The Presidential Pardon

A History Of The Presidential Pardon

By:


The power to pardon is constitutional, unchecked except in cases of impeachment. In Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution it states

"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."

The pardon power is absolute except in cases of an impeachment. It is worth noting there is no legislative check on the president's power to pardon.

From the very beginning, the pardon power was controversial. Several of the country's founders believed it to be a problematic power, due mostly to a history of abuse by European royals. Founders supporting a plenary presidential pardon authority mostly prevailed, the only check on that power being that the president could not forgive those who had previously been impeached. This was necessary to maintain the balance of power inherent in the separation of power framework.

Beginning with George Washington and the pardoning of those indicted and convicted of treason in the wake of the 1791 Whiskey Rebellion, the decisions on whom to pardon and when has resulted in ongoing debate, most recently culminating in the failure of President George W. Bush to forgive the criminal transgressions of Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff. Washington did establish that the penultimate crime against the country (treason) was a pardonable one, but whether or not the offenders deserved it was another matter entirely - this though Virginia Governor Henry Lee had already issued a general pardon covering even those who had not yet been charged with a crime.

Andrew Johnson's pardoning of the "common Southerner" after assuming the presidency in 1865 raised eyebrows, in addition to his refusal to extend blanket amnesty to the upper classes of Southern society, making the aristocrats he blamed for starting the Civil War apply individually for his forgiveness. Fulfilling a campaign promise, Jimmy Carter conveyed a blanket pardon to those who avoided draft service during the Vietnam War, though being careful not to extend clemency to war protesters, those receiving less than honorable discharges, and deserters.

The primary reason for the controversy underlying many pardons is a simple one: second chances for serious offenses are always debatable. Each person pardoned has previously been determined by the judicial system worthy of punishment and infamy. It is a testament to the soundness of the pardon power, however, that pardon controversies are relatively rare in relation to the number of pardons actually granted (table showing pardon statistics, by administration, since 1945).

In the more modern era, Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton's pardon of Patty Hearst, Caspar Weinberger by George H.W. Bush and Switzerland-relocated fugitive Marc Rich by Bill Clinton have all become controversial examples of the use of the presidential pardon power.

About the Author:
Nathan Moore is a Nashville criminal defense attorney licensed in both the state and federal courts in Tennessee. His legal practice includes all aspects of criminal procedure: trial defense, motions, expungements, appeals, and requests for presidential pardons. Learn more about obtaining a felony conviction pardon on his website or by contacting him directly at (615) 346-2213.



Article Originally Published On: http://www.articlesnatch.com


Tags: , ,

|

Loading...
Related....
Videos...

Recent Legal Articles

Comments

Still can't find what you are looking for? Search for it!

Loading

Site Navigation:

Copyright 2005-2011 ArticleSnatch, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service.